Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Processes carried out to develop heuristics for the evaluation of interactive systems for children with ASD.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Group of similar heuristics.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Mapping between guidelines and original heuristics.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Grouping of remaining guidelines and creation of heuristics.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Modified set of heuristics.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Demographic profiles of experts.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Questions and options.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Descriptions of questions.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Comments of experts and the actions performed.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Demographic information of participants.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 4.

Hypothesis model.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Number of usability problems and average severity ratings found in System 1 by both groups.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Number of usability problems and average severity ratings found in System 2 by both groups.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 8.

Number of problems and average severity rating using different types of heuristics in both of the systems reported by control and experimental groups.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 7.

Number of usability problems and average severity ratings found in System 1 and System 2 using 5 new heuristics of the modified set.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 9.

Examples of problems found using 5 improved heuristics.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Examples of problems found by frequently violated heuristics.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Fig 8.

Estimated marginal means of problem identification by both sets of heuristics.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Estimated marginal means of problem identification among four groups at different severity levels.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Estimated marginal means of problem identification by groups 2 and 4 at different severity levels.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Analysed model when a = 0.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Analysed model when a≠0.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Table 11.

Results of both phases of study.

More »

Table 11 Expand