Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Cut-off values for reference standard questionnaires.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Distribution STarT-G totalscore.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Distribution STarT-G psychosocial subscore.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Comparison of positive answers to StarT items (“Agree” / “Trifft zu”).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Convergent construct validity: Spearmans rank correlation coefficients.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 3.

STarT-G totalscore against RMDQ Score.

RMDQ: Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

STarT-G psychosocial subscore against PCS Score.

PCS: Pain Catastrophizing Scale.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Receiver operating characteristic curve for STarT-G totalscore against RMDQ cases.

AUC 0.79 (95% CI 0.67–0.92); RMDQ: Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Receiver operating characteristic curve for STarT-G totalscore against composite reference standard cases.

AUC 0.81 (95% CI 0.65–0.98).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Receiver operating characteristic curve for STarT-G psychosocial subscore against composite reference standard cases.

AUC 0.88 (95% CI 0.71–1.00).

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Receiver operating characteristic curve for risk group against composite reference standard cases.

AUC 0.91 (95% CI 0.77–1.00).

More »

Fig 8 Expand