Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of all subjects.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Serum levels of five biomarkers in control, non-NASH, NASH and other disease groups.

Levels of CK-18-M30, FGF-21, IL-1Ra and PEDF were significantly higher in NAFLD training group (A-D) whereas OPG was significantly lower (E), significant at **P < 0.01. There were no statistically significant differences among the serum biomarker levels between healthy controls and AFLD, HBV and HCV groups.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

AUROC and OR analysis of serum biomarkers to determine effectiveness in diagnosing NASH.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Stepwise combination of serum biomarkers increased diagnosis performance for NASH in NAFLD patients.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

NASH diagnosis by serum biomarkers in NAFLD training group and validation group.

(A) NASH diagnosis solely by CK-18-M30. (B) 5-step combination of serum biomarkers in diagnosing NASH in training group. (C) 5-step combination of serum biomarkers in diagnosing NASH in validation group.

More »

Fig 2 Expand