Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics according to Final Diagnosis.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

The distribution of FNA-Tg in lymph node metastasis and benign groups according to the TgAb.

(A) Comparison of FNA-Tg levels in all groups. (B) Comparison of FNA-Tg levels in the sTgAb- group. (C) Comparison of FNA-Tg levels in the sTgAb+ group. The cutoff values of FNA-Tg between malignant and benign lymph nodes were presented as arrows (19.9 [= exp (2.989)] ng/mL in a, 19.9 [= exp (2.989)] ng/mL in b, 38.3 [= exp (4.256)] ng/mL in c, respectively). The abscissa represents the logarithmically transformed values of FNA-Tgs to adjust for skewed distributions. sTgAb-, undetectable serum TgAbs; sTgAb+, detectable serum TgAbs; All groups, sTgAb- and sTgAb+ groups being included together; FNA-Tg, thyroglobulin level in FNA washout fluid; LN, lymph node.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Diagnostic performances of FNA-Tg according to the presence of serum TgAbs.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Diagnostic performance comparison between FNA alone and the combination of FNA with FNA-Tg.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Review of diagnostic performances of FNA-Tg and the combination of FNA with FNA-Tg.

More »

Table 4 Expand