Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of HCM patients.

Values are given as total number of patients (n) or as mean ± SD.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Influence of disease related factors and medication on the orthostatic test result in 69 HCM patients older than or equal to 40 years.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Influence of disease related factors and medication on the QTc interval in 100 HCM patients.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

Impact of orthostatic test on the occurrence of adverse events in HCM patients for all patients (A) and for the subgroup of patients > 40 yrs (B).

Sensitivity, specificity, PPV (positive predictive value), NPV (negative predictive value) and OR (odds ratio; adjusted for age and sex) with 95%-CI (confidence intervals) are given in the table below. AE = adverse events (syncope, presyncope, VT).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Impact of QTc prolongation on the occurrence of adverse events in HCM patients.

Sensitivity, specificity, PPV (positive predictive value), NPV (negative predictive value) and OR (odds ratio; adjusted for age and sex) with 95%-CI (confidence intervals) are given in the table below. AE = adverse events (syncope, presyncope, VT).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Relationship between orthostatic test result and QTc prolongation.

The percentages of patients with a positive and negative orthostatic test result are given for the group with and without QTc prolongation.

More »

Fig 3 Expand