Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Time delay impacts for typical excavation practices with drilling and blasting [8].

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Relations of the instrument and its environment.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Operations of mobile mining equipment in mine excavation.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Operations of mobile mining equipment in mine production.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Example diagram of obtaining T (hollow dots—not counted, solid dots—counted, the solid dots with red core—also added on the relevant moving time).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Comparison of timespans with different sequences.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Flow chart of grouping algorithm.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Grouping result of a conceptual vertical long-side section of an underground mine (number: Face ID; black line: path; blue circle: group and sub-group).

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Flow chart of machine set algorithm.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Clustering result of two machine sets (number: Face ID; black line: path; red border: mining area).

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Scheduling result of two machine sets.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Flow chart of machine sharing algorithm.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Scheduling result using machine sharing algorithm (assuming there are three sets of mining fleets, but one Machine 4 in one set is unavailable).

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Cross section of Kittilä underground mine [24].

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Layout of Kittilä mine with the locations of the working face used in the case.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Scheduling output for the weekly plan of Kittilä mine.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Table 1.

Scenarios created for testing.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 17.

Relation graph of inputs, algorithms and outputs.

More »

Fig 17 Expand