Table 1.
Correspondence table between the different M. tuberculosis taxonomies.
Fig 1.
Relative prevalence of main M. tuberculosis complex lineages in the Netherlands (2005ā2008).
Table 2.
Major clusters of the 2004ā2008 Netherlands RIVM collection (nā„10).
Fig 2.
Concordance of existing classifications with the consensus classification proposed in this study.
Table 3.
Accuracy of different induction algorithms on the training dataset using 10-fold stratified cross-validation.
Fig 3.
TBminer Lineage Prediction tool: the output file.
Fig 4.
TBminer Prediction tool performance on Miru-VntrPlus database.
A. Concordance between TBminer Pred2_Miru-Vntr and Miru-VntrPlus assignations. B. Concordance between Pred6 and manual expert assignation accounting for original labels.
Fig 5.
TBminer Prediction tool performance on a Pakistanis sample.
Consensus Lineage Prediction tool of TBminer was compared to the Expert assignation on an independent dataset from Pakistan.
Table 4.
Concordance between SNP classification and the newly proposed and automatized consensus tool on a set of isolates with conflicting assignations in existing taxonomies.
Fig 6.
Approach for consensus building between conflictive taxonomies.