Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Schematic diagram of the MMPs-TRFIA for determinations of HBeAg, Anti-HBs and FT4.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Calibration curves for MMPs-TRFIA for determinations of HBeAg (A), Anti-HBs (B) and FT4 (C) standards.

Fluorescence intensity and standard deviations were calculated from a set of five measurements.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Functional detection limits of HBeAg, Anti-HBs and FT4 were the lowest analyte concentration that could be measured with a CV of 15% or less in ten replica measurements.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Comparison of sensitivity and linear range for the determination of HBeAg, Anti-HBs and FT4 by previously reported methods.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Accuracy of MMPs-TRFIA was calculated by measuring seril dilutions of known concentration substances and these results were compared to the quantity's actual value.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Assay precision: intra-assay and inter-assay stability of the MMPs-TRFIA.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Assay specificity: effect of potentially interfering substances on the determination of HBeAg, Anti-HBs and FT4.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 4.

Plot of the results obtained with the proposed method versus those obtained using CLIA for 184 positive HBeAg samples (A), 210 positive anti-HBs samples (B) and 202 FT4 samples(C).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 5.

McNemar’s test between the proposed method and CLIA for the test of 257 HBeAg samples.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

McNemar’s test between the proposed method and CLIA for the test of 269 anti-HBs samples.

More »

Table 6 Expand