Fig 1.
Delphi process to identify the key dimensions of QoPIIPC
Table 1.
Expert surveys and respondent groups.
Table 2.
Index validation domains, benchmarks, and selection criteria.
Table 3.
Steps in scoring QoPIIPC indices and comparing validation performance.
Table 4.
Consensus model of QoPIIPC and sample items.
Table 5.
QoC Assessment sample sizes.
Table 6.
Characteristics of observed deliveries1.
Table 7.
Description of 7 potential QoPIIPC indices evaluated across validation benchmarks.
Table 8.
Items included in potential QoPIIPC indices1.
Table 9.
Summary of index performance across validation domains1.
Table 10.
Comparison of reference and constructed QoPIIPC indices1 —Descriptive statistics and performance on benchmarks across validation domains using Tanzania (incl. Zanzibar) Round 1 data.
Table 11.
Items in the recommended QoPIIPC index.
Fig 2.
AUROCs (discrimination of good total quality score (top 25%)): Recommended QoPIIPC index.
Fig 3.
AUROCs (discrimination of good total quality score (top 25%)): Comparison of the 3+ index and the recommended index.
Fig 4.
Frequency of performance of items in recommended QoPIIPC index across countries.
Table 12.
Predicted probabilities of good performance at different scores on recommended QoPIIPC index using Tanzania Round 1 (incl. Zanzibar) data.