Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

3D ear acquisition system: (a) Our developed 3D ear acquisition device, (b) 2D ear images with laser lines on them, and (c) 3D ear points cloud sample

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Four types of laser triangulation imaging models.

(a) laser point, (b) line scanning, (c) multi-lines scanning and (d) laser grid.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Principle of the laser-triangulation imaging.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Architecture of the developed 3-D ear data acquisition device.

(1) CCD camera, (2) camera lens, (3) laser projector, (4) step motor, (5) photoelectric encoder, (6) motion controller, (7) signal and power control box, and (8) device shell.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Three-Dimensional ear data collection and processing process (the red solid arrows denote the sending command; the green arrows, from “CCD camera / Laser projector” to “Computer”, denote the data transmission of collecting; and the blue arrows, from “Computer” to “3D Ear”, denote data processing).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Illustration of the parameters for calibration.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Components of the 3D ear acqusition system.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Illustration of one-step rotation in laser scanning.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 1.

Illustration of parameters variation with different subdivision numbers.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Specifications of core components.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 9.

Three-dimensional ear samples viewed in different angle (each row is collected from one ear).

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Contour maps of different ear samples (the top row is contour maps drawn from one ear, the bottom row is contour maps drawn from another ear).

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Matching results based on database.

(a) Genuine-Impostor distribution curve, (b) ROC curve.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 3.

Performance Comparison with commercial scanner (Vivid 910).

More »

Table 3 Expand