Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Workflow for Illumina sequencing, de novo assembly, annotation, and other analysis carried out in the leaf transcriptome of Cassia angustifolia.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Throughput and quality of Illumina sequencing of Cassia angustifolia leaf transcriptome.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Assembly and CDS statistics of Illumina sequencing of Cassia angustifolia in the leaf transcriptome.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Distribution of blast results of CDS in the Cassia. angustifolia leaf transcriptome.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

GO Classification in A) young and B) mature leaf transcriptome of Cassia angustifolia.

Cassia angustifolia CDS were searched against the non-redundent protein sequences available in the Uni-ProtKB/SwisProt database using BLASTX with E value threshold of 1e-06 in order to assign putative function. Out of 42,230 and 37,174 CDS in young and mature leaf respectively, 29,944 (70.9%) CDS in young and 28,099 (75.5%) CDS in mature leaf transcriptome showed significant hits to the Uni-ProtKB/SwisProt data set thereby showing overall gene conservation. In addition, many C. angustifolia transcripts showed homology to uncharacterised proteins annotated as unknown, hypothetical and expressed proteins.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Clusters of orthologous groups (COG) functional classification of CDS in the young and mature leaf transcriptome of Cassia angustifolia.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Distribution of the different classes of Transcription factors in the leaf transcriptome of Cassia angustifolia.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Top 10 Pfam domains represented in InterProScan transcript annotations of the Cassia angustifolia leaf Transcriptome.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

KEGG pathway analysis of CDS in the young and mature leaf transcriptome of Cassia angustifolia.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Mapping of the genes expressing differentially in young vs mature leaf on the putative sennoside biosynthetic pathway in Cassia angustifolia.

DAHPS:3-deoxy-7-phosphoheptulonate synthase[EC:2.5.1.54], DHQS: 3-dehydroquinate synthase[EC:4.2.3.4],DHQS/SDH: 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase / shikimate dehydrogenase[EC:4.2.1.10 1.1.1.25], SMK: shikimate kinase[EC:2.7.1.71], EPSP Synthase: 3-phosphoshikimate 1-carboxyvinyltransferase/enolpyruvylshikimate phosphate synthase [EC:2.5.1.19], chorismate synthase [EC:4.2.3.5] menF: isochorismate synthase [EC:5.4.4.2], menF/menD/menH/menC or PHYLLO: isochorismate synthase / 2-succinyl-5-enolpyruvyl-6-hydroxy-3-cyclohexene-1-carboxylate synthase / 2-succinyl-6-hydroxy-2,4-cyclohexadiene-1-carboxylate synthase / O-succinylbenzoate synthase[EC:5.4.4.2 2.2.1.9 4.2.99.20 4.2.1.113], menE: Succinylbenzoic acid-CoA ligase/acyl-activating enzyme 14 [EC:6.2.1.26], menB: naphthoate synthase[EC:4.1.3.36], DXPS: 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase[EC:2.2.1.7], DXR: 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate[EC:1.1.1.267], ISPD: 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate cytidylyltransferase [EC:2.7.7.60], CDPMEK:4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol kinase[EC:2.7.1.148], ISPF: 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 2,4-cyclodiphosphate synthase[EC:4.6.1.12], HDS: (E)-4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enyl-diphosphate synthase[EC:1.17.7.1], HDR: 4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enyl diphosphate reductase[EC:1.17.1.2], ACCP Transferase: acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase [EC:2.3.1.9], HMGS:hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA synthase [EC:2.3.3.10], HMGR: hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (NADPH) [EC:1.1.1.34], MK: mevalonate kinase[EC:2.7.1.36], PMK: phosphomevalonate kinase [EC:2.7.4.2], MPD: diphosphomevalonate decarboxylase[EC:4.1.1.33], IPPS: isopentenyl-diphosphate delta-isomerase[EC:5.3.3.2], PKS: Polyketide Synthase, PKC:Polyketide Cyclase, UGT:UDP-Glucosyl Transferase; Y_ID:Young leaf CDS ID number for enzyme, M_ID:Mature leaf CDS ID number for enzyme, Y_FPKM: Young leaf CDS FPKM value, M_FPKM: Mature leaf CDS FPKM value, Log Fold Change: Log of change in folds of expression of CDS in young compared to matured leaf transcripts.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 4.

Putative genes involved in sennoside biosynthesis identified in the leaf transcriptome of Cassia angustifolia.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 8.

Heat map of top 100 differentially expressed genes in young and mature leaf transcriptome of Cassia angustifolia.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

FPKM values based gene expression of annotated cytochrome P450s (CYPs) in leaf transctiptome of Cassia angustifolia.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 5.

Differential expression of genes involved in the sennoside biosynthesis in the Cassia angustifolia leaf transcriptome.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Statistics of SSRs identified using MISA in the leaf transcriptome of Cassia angustifolia.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 10.

Variation in the total sennoside content (%) with ontogeny of the leaves.

More »

Fig 10 Expand