Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Chinese DIC Scoring System (CDSS).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

The flow diagram of the whole study process.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score and 28-day mortality by the clinical manifestation.

Bar graph shows 28-day mortality (*p = 0.000). Line graph shows the average APACHE II score (**p = 0.000).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score and 28-day mortality by the dynamic platelet decrease.

Bar graph shows 28-day mortality (***p = 0.003). Line graph shows the average APACHE II score (**p = 0.000).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score and 28-day mortality by prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT).

Bar graph shows 28-day mortality (*p = 0.000). Line graph shows the average APACHE II score (**p = 0.000).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Classification of underlying diseases and diagnostic rate by each criteria for DIC.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 5.

Distribution of patients with non-hematological malignancy according to the three diagnostic criteria.

Left, comparison between the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) and Chinese DIC scoring system (CDSS); right, comparison between the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) and Chinese DIC scoring system (CDSS). Numbers in parentheses are of nonsurvivors.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 3.

Characteristics of the diagnosis and mortality by each criterion in non- hematological malignancy.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 6.

Distribution of patients with hematological malignancy according to the three diagnostic criteria.

Left, comparison between the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) and Chinese DIC scoring system (CDSS); right, comparison between the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW) and Chinese DIC scoring system (CDSS). Numbers in parentheses are of nonsurvivors.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 4.

Characteristics of the diagnosis and mortality by each criterion in hematological malignancy.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 7.

Relativity between CDSS scores and average APACHE II or SOFA scores.

CDSS, Chinese DIC scoring system; APACHE, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment. Bar graph shows average SOFA score. Line graph shows average APACHE II score.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 5.

Characteristics of DIC and non-DIC patients diagnosed by CDSS.

More »

Table 5 Expand