Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Coded matrix of the CCRD experimental design.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Response surface fitted to experimental data points corresponding to the growth of Sc. pombe on the 5th and 30th day of observation as a function of glucose, ethanol and sulfur dioxide, in red wine CCRD experiments.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Linear and quadratic effects of glucose, sulfur dioxide and ethanol concentrations on the growth of Sc. pombe.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Model equations describing the response surfaces fitted to the CCRD experimental data points.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Response surface fitted to experimental data points corresponding to the growth of Z. bailii on the 5th and 30th day of observation as a function of glucose, ethanol and sulfur dioxide, in red wine CCRD experiments.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

Linear and quadratic effects of glucose, sulfur dioxide and ethanol concentrations on the growth of Z. bailii.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 3.

Response surface fitted to experimental data points corresponding to the growth of Sa. ludwigii on the 5th and 30th day of observation as a function of glucose, ethanol and sulfur dioxide, in red wine CCRD experiments.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 5.

Linear and quadratic effects of glucose, sulfur dioxide and ethanol concentrations on the growth of Sa. ludwigii.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 4.

Response surface fitted to experimental data points corresponding to the growth of S. cerevisiae on the 5th and 30th day of observation as a function of glucose, ethanol and sulfur dioxide, in red wine CCRD experiments.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 6.

Linear and quadratic effects of glucose, sulfur dioxide and ethanol concentrations on the growth of S. cerevisiae.

More »

Table 6 Expand