Table 1.
The findings based on mammography, MRI and histological results for our patient cohort.
Fig 1.
The proposed framework for MRI to mammography registration.
Fig 2.
The study flowchart of evaluation of lesion using integrated information from MRI and mammography.
Table 2.
MRI morphologic data in our patient cohort.
Fig 3.
Illustration of the pre- and post- registration of breast MRI with annotation to fuse on mammography in a selected patient for the CC view.
(a) the annotation (red) in MIP of MRI (b) (e) the annotation in mammography (green) (c) the fused annotations from MRI to the mammography (d) the registered MRI with annotation (red) (f) the fusion of registered annotation from MRI to mammography. The yellow area is the overlapping part between the annotations of the fused MRI and mammography.
Fig 4.
Illustration of the pre- and post- registration of breast MRI with annotation to fuse on mammography in a selected patient for the MLO view.
(a) the annotation (red) in MIP of MRI (b)(e) the annotation in mammography (green) (c) the fused annotations from MRI to the mammography (d) the registered MRI with annotation (red) (f) the fusion of registered annotation from MRI to mammography. The yellow area is the overlapping part between the annotations of the fused MRI and mammography.
Fig 5.
A 54-year-old woman with invasive ductal carcinoma in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast.
(a) MRI annotation (b) the kinetic curve for MRI annotations indicating the Type 3 for the lesion (c) the deformed MRI annotation to register the mammography (d) the microcalcification observed in mammography in corresponding contour.
Table 3.
The errors of pre- and post-registration with the assigned control points for CC and MLO view.
Table 4.
The comparison of histological results with indication of MRI assessment with/without information of mammography.