Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Integrative model of sex-related online behaviors, perceived peer norms, and sexual behavior.

Bold construct and arrows represent the tested hypotheses.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Descriptive Statistics for Key Variables in the Integrative Model for Boys and Girls.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Pearson Correlations between Key Variables in the Integrative Model for Boys and Girls.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Estimated model for SEIM use.

Values are standardized regression coefficients, significant at least at p < .05 (two-tailed), unless indicated otherwise. Values before the slash represent estimates for boys; values behind the slash represent estimates for girls. Model fit boys: Comparative Fit Index = 1.00, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = .04. Model fit girls: Comparative Fit Index = .99, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = .08.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Estimated model for SNS use.

Values are standardized regression coefficients, significant at least at p < .05 (two-tailed), unless indicated otherwise. Values before the slash represent estimates for boys; values behind the slash represent estimates for girls. Dashed line represents indirect effect. Model fit boys: Comparative Fit Index = 1.00, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = .04. Model fit girls: Comparative Fit Index = .99, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = .06.

More »

Fig 3 Expand