Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Anthropometric, physiological, training and performance characteristics (means ± SD) of the 8 male and 8 female elite cross-country skiers who participated in the study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Illustration of the set-ups for upper-body poling (A) and pull-down strength (B).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Power output, work per cycle, cycle rate and velocities of trunk flexion, shoulder extension and elbow flexion (negative value) and elbow extension (positive value) for the 8 male and 8 female cross-country skiers during upper-body poling at submaximal intensity (submax), and during a 3-min maximal performance test (3-min) and a 30-sec all-out test (30-sec).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Relative power output and kinematics (means ± SD) for the 8 male and 8 female elite cross-country skiers during upper-body poling at submaximal intensity and during a 3-min maximal performance and 30-sec all-out test.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Physiological responses (means ± SD) of the 8 male and 8 female elite cross-country skiers during upper-body poling at submaximal intensity and during a 3-min maximal performance and 30-sec all-out test.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Total body, lean and fat mass of the 8 male and 8 female elite cross-country skiers, presented as absolute and percentage values, and relative to total body mass (%TBM) (means ± SD).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Characteristics of the training during the six months prior to testing (May-October) as reported by the 8 male and 8 female elite cross-country skiers.

More »

Table 5 Expand