Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow chart of study selection.

For details of study identification.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Self-related pain for surgical versus conservative treatment.

A: mean difference (MD) at the end of the intervention (not longer than 3 months). B: MD at six months. C: MD at long-term follow-up period (12 months or more). PV, percutaneous vertebroplasty; BK, balloon kyphoplasty; CI, confidence interval; IV, inverse variance.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Funnel plot of included studies regarding self-related pain in the short term.

Short term: not longer than 3 months. Log of mean difference were plotted against the standard error of mean difference of each study to identify asymmetry in the distribution of trials.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Overall adverse events for surgical versus conservative treatment.

Markers represent point estimates of risk ratios, marker size represents study weight in random-effects meta-analysis. Horizontal bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. CI, confidence interval; M-H, mantel-haenszel.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Incidence of new fractures for surgical versus conservative treatment.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

RMD score for surgical versus conservative treatment in the short term.

Short term: not longer than 3 months.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

SF-36 PCS score for surgical versus conservative treatment.

A: mean difference (MD) at the end of the intervention (not longer than 3 months). B: MD at long-term follow-up period (12 months or more).

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Self-related pain for surgical versus sham surgical treatment.

Short term: not longer than 3 months; Mid term: 6 months.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of results.

More »

Table 2 Expand