Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Fitness trajectories over time.

Fitness trajectories for each method, shown separately, have the form w = (bT +1)a, where w is fitness, T is time in generations, and a and b are model parameters. Black circles and curve show the Traditional method; blue squares and curve show the ASR method; red triangles and curve show the DCC method.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Coefficient of variation over time.

Lines are linear regressions on the relevant data. Black circles and line show the Traditional method; blue squares and line show the ASR method; red triangles and line show the DCC method. S1 Fig shows the confidence bands associated with each regression line.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

ANOVA on the coefficient of variation across time and comparing the three methods used to estimate fitness.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

ANOVA on the coefficient of variation across time and comparing the Traditional and DCC methods.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Histogram of bootstrap analysis.

Histogram showing the distribution for the bootstrapped sums of squared differences in the coefficient of variation for 3 arbitrary groupings of the combined data. The dark arrow indicates the difference for the actual grouping of the 3 methods employed. The light arrow shows the most extreme 5% of the sums of the squared differences.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Selected evolution experiments.

More »

Table 3 Expand