Table 1.
CREW Drift fence array labels, locations (WGS 84) and habitat types.
Fig 1.
Cumulative yearly rainfall and best-fit regression lines from three locations proximal to the CREW preserve.
All three locations represent aggregated data from multiple sampling sites.
Table 2.
Species abundance for the two sampling periods and results of McNemar’s test for population decline or expansion and paired t-tests of catch rate data (p-values).
Table 3.
SIMPER results comparing mean abundance of herpetofauna collected between 1995–97 and 2010–11 and species contributions to the dissimilarity among habitat types between the two sampling periods (total average dissimilarity = 48.44%).
Table 4.
Changes in univariate measures of the herpetofauna community (species richness, Margalef Richness, and Shannon diversity index) from 1995–97 (1995 in table) and 2010–11 (2010 in table), separated by array site.
Fig 2.
Non-metric multi-dimensional scaling ordination based on Bray-Curtis similarity.
Samples are labeled by array number, habitat, and year. Circles identify groupings that hierarchical cluster analysis indicated to be significantly different from one another at the 95% confidence level.