Table 1.
Range of physico-chemical data of Maltański Reservoir.
Fig 1.
Concentration of nitrogen forms in Maltański Reservoir.
Fig 2.
Concentration of phosphate phosphorus on the surface and the depth of 3m.
Fig 3.
The participation of taxa belonging to main algal groups identified in Maltański Reservoir.
CYA-Cyanobacteria, EUG-Euglenophyceae, CRY-Cryptophyceae, CHR-Chrysophyceae, BAC-Bacillariophyceae, CHL-Chlorophyceae, DIN-Dinophyceae, XAN-Xantophyceae, CON-Conjugatophyceae.
Fig 4.
The mean, maximum and minimum values of Shannon-Weaver index in each year in Maltański Reservoir.
Fig 5.
The diversity of evenness parameter in each sampling date in Maltański Reservoir.
Fig 6.
The abundance of phytoplankton groups in the investigated period (an example from the depth of 1 m).
Fig 7.
The biomass of phytoplankton groups in the investigated period (an example from the depth of 1 m).
Fig 8.
Share of the abundance of zooplankton groups in Maltański Reservoir (an example from the depth of 2 m).
Fig 9.
The abundance of cladocerans and copepods (an example from the depth of 2 m).
Fig 10.
RDA biplot showing relationships between phytoplankton size fractions (a), taxonomical groups (b), the most abundant taxa and selected environmental factors directly dependent on restoration measures (c).
Abbreviations: cond-conductivity, ON-organic nitrogen, oxy-oxygen saturation, temp-temperature, R+n—rotifers and nauplii, FILT- filter feeders, PRED- predators, nono- nanophytoplankton, micro-microphytoplankton, Aph.gra.-Aphanizomenon gracile, Ast.for.-Asterionella formosa, Aul.gran.-Aulacoseira granulata, centr- centric diatom, Chr.min.-Chrysococcus minutus., Chl.sp.-Chlamydomonas sp., Coe.ast.- Coelastrum astroideum, Cry.mar.- Cryptomonas marssonii, Cry. ova.- Cryptomonas ovata, Cry.ref.- Cryptomonas reflexa, Cus.iss.-Cuspidothrix issatschenkoi, Cru. tet.- Crucigenia tetrapedia, Des.com.- Desmodesmus communis, Des.opo.- Desmodesmus opoliensis, Din.div.- Dinobryon divergens, Erk.sub.-Erkenia subaequiciliata, Fra.cro.-Fragilaria crotonensis, Kol.spi.-Koliella spiculiformis, Lim.red-Limnothrix redekei, Mon.con.-Monoraphidium contortum, Mon. min.- Monoraphidium minutum, Nit.aci.- Nitszchia acicularis, Nit.clo.- Nitszchia acicularis var. closterioides, Nit. spp—Nitszchia spp., Ooc.lac.- Oocystis lacustris, Ped.bor.- Pediastrum boryanum, Pha.lent.- Phacotus lenticularis, Pla.aga—Planktothrix agardhii, Rho.lac.- Rhodomonas lacustris, Sce.acu.- Scenedesmus acuminatus, Syn.uve.- Synura uvella, Uln.acu.- Ulnaria acus.
Fig 11.
RDA biplot showing relationships between phytoplankton size fractions (a), taxonomical groups (b), the most abundant taxa and selected factors independent from the restoration measurments (c).
Abbreviations the same as on Fig 10.
Table 2.
Forward selection results of Monte Carlo test of relationships between phytoplankton (size fractions (a), taxonomical groups (b), the most abundant taxa (c)) and selected environmental factors directly dependent on restoration measures.
Table 3.
Forward selection results of Monte Carlo test of relationships between a-phytoplankton size fractions, b-taxonomical groups, c-the most abundant taxa and selected environmental factors independent from restoration measurements.