Fig 1.
Physical Flow.
Fig 2.
ℏ-curve for functions f, g and θ.
Fig 3.
ℏ-curve for function ϕ.
Fig 4.
ℏ—curve for residual error .
Fig 5.
ℏ—curve for residual error .
Fig 6.
ℏ—curve for residual error .
Fig 7.
ℏ—curve for residual error .
Fig 8.
Solution curves for f(η) and g(η).
Fig 9.
Total error vs. order of approximations.
Fig 10.
Influence of K on f′.
Fig 11.
Influence of K on g′.
Fig 12.
Influence of γ on θ.
Fig 13.
Influence of Le on θ.
Fig 14.
Influence of Nb on θ.
Fig 15.
Influence of Nt on θ.
Fig 16.
Influence of Nb on ϕ.
Fig 17.
Influence of Nt on ϕ.
Fig 18.
Effects of K and β on skin friction.
Fig 19.
Effects of β and M on skin friction.
Fig 20.
Effects of M and Ec on -θ′(0).
Fig 21.
Effects of M and β on -ϕ′(0).
Table 1.
Convergence of series solution for different order of approximations when β = 0.1, K = 0.02, M = 0.05, γ = 0.1, Pr = 1, ℏf = ℏg = ℏθ = −0.5.
Table 2.
Numerical values of skin friction coefficient () for different parameters.
Table 3.
Numerical values of skin friction coefficient () for different parameters.
Table 4.
Values of local Nusselt number for different values of the parameters β, M, γ, Pr, α, Ec, Nb, Nt, Le, δ and K.
Table 5.
Values of local Sherwood number −ϕ′(0) for different values of the parameters β, K, M, γ, α, Ec, Nb, Nt, Le, δ and K.
Table 6.
Comparison of f′′(0) and g′′(0) with HPM and exact solutions [28] in limiting case for K = M = 0.
Table 7.
Comparison of skin friction coefficient () for different parameters with Ramzan et al. [11].
Table 8.
Comparison of local Nusselt number for different values of the parameters β, K, M, γ, and Pr when Nt = Nb = 0.