Fig 1.
Relationships between eDNA concentrations of common carp in mesocosms that were measured using qPCR and ddPCR.
Black, red, and green symbols indicate samples collected on days 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Solid red and dashed red lines indicate Type II regression and 95% CI, respectively.
Fig 2.
Relationships between eDNA concentrations of common carp and coefficients of variation (CV, %) measured using qPCR and ddPCR.
Solid red and dashed red lines indicate Type II regression and 95% CI, respectively. Boxes in the box plot indicate median ± quartiles, and points indicate the outliers. The means of CVs were significantly different by Welch’s t-test (t = –2.98, p = 0.0047).
Fig 3.
Relationships between eDNA concentrations of common carp and their abundance in the mesocosm experiment.
Black, red, and green symbols indicate samples collected on days 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Solid red and dashed red lines indicate Type II regression and 95% CI, respectively.
Fig 4.
Relationships between eDNA concentrations of common carp and their biomass in the mesocosm experiment.
Black, red, and green symbols indicate samples collected on days 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Solid red and dashed red lines indicate Type II regression and 95% CI, respectively.