Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Mean (and standard deviation) of Body Dissatisfaction (BD), Ugly, Sadness, and the aggregated Negative Affect (NA) VAS scores and the negative Thoughts Checklist (TCL) scores for the low body dissatisfaction (LBD) and high body dissatisfaction (HBD) groups.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Mean (and standard deviation) of averaged heart rate (HR) and skin conductance (SC) during the five experimental periods in the low body dissatisfaction (LBD) and high body dissatisfaction (HBD) groups.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Heart rate (HR) responses.

Peak HR values along the view of the 12 body parts (in the order: (1) open the mirror, (2) look ahead at the whole body, (3) back of the body, (4) face and head, (5) neck and shoulders, (6) arms, (7) chest, (8) abdomen, (9) buttocks, (10) thighs, (11) hips, and (12) calves) during the four exposure trials as a function of group. (discontinuous lines and open rhombs represent the low body dissatisfaction group and continuous lines and closed circles the high body dissatisfaction group).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Skin conductance (SC) responses.

Peak SC values along the view of the 12 body parts during the four exposure trials as a function of group. (same body parts and symbols as in Fig 1).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Ugly scores and heart rate (HR).

Scatterplot and regression line for the relationship between ugly scores and averaged HR in the low body dissatisfaction group during exposition trial 1.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Correlations between Ugly-negative Thoughts Checklist (TCL) scores and averaged heart rate (HR) and between Sadness scores and averaged skin conductance (SC).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Sadness and skin conductance (SC).

Scatterplot and regression line for the relationship between sadness scores and averaged SC in the low body dissatisfaction group during exposition trial 2.

More »

Fig 4 Expand