Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Anatomic MR images for anaplastic gliomas with different ratios of enhancement to necrosis (≥ 2 and < 2).

The areas of contrast enhancement are marked in yellow; areas of central necrosis are marked in blue; areas of T2 hyperintensity (exclusion of contrast enhancement) are marked in green.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Characteristics of overall patients with anaplastic gliomas.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Volumetric ratios of enhancement to necrosis in anaplastic gliomas with different VEGF expression levels.

(A) Ratio of enhancement volume to necrosis volume in the low VEGF expression group (LEG) and high VEGF expression group (HEG) (Mann-Whitney, p = 0.009). (B) Ratio of enhancement volume to T2 hyperintensity volume in the low VEGF expression group and high VEGF expression group (Mann-Whitney, p = 0.681). (C) The volumetric ratios of necrosis to T2 hyperintensity in the low VEGF expression group and high VEGF expression group were not significantly different (Mann-Whitney, p = 0.277).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivals using volumetric ratio of enhancement to necrosis.

Log-rank analysis indicated (A) a significant PFS advantage (log-rank, p = 0.013) and (B) a significant OS advantage (log-rank, p = 0.001) for patients with anaplastic gliomas with a high volumetric ratio (≥ 2) of enhancement to necrosis.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Univariate analysis of survival outcomes.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Multivariate analysis of survival outcomes.

More »

Table 3 Expand