Table 1.
Density and coverage per LR field.
Table 2.
Prevalance of citations and social media metrics per document type.
Fig 1.
Percentage of counts referring to a particular document type.
Percentage of papers, citations and social and mainstream media counts mentioning a particular WoS document type. The papers distribution serves as a reference of expected values if all documents were equally cited or mentioned.
Table 3.
Spearman correlation between variables.
Fig 2.
Relationship with the length of the publications [PG].
Proportion of publications of getting at least one metric (coverage; B, C) and citation and social media density (A, D-H) conditioned by the number of pages.
Fig 3.
Relationship with the number of references [NR].
Proportion of publications of getting at least one metric (coverage; B, C) and citation and social media density (A, D-H) conditioned by the number of references (A, D-H).
Fig 4.
Relationship with the title length [TI].
Proportion of publications of getting at least one metric (coverage; B, C) and citation and social media density (A, D-H) conditioned by the number of characters in the title (A, D-H).
Fig 5.
Relationship with the number of authors [AU].
Proportion of publications of getting at least one metric (coverage; B, C) and citation and social media density (A, D-H) conditioned by the number of authors (A, D-H).