Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flowchart of the proposed image encryption algorithm.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Division of the plain-image.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Shuffling of the image blocks Blk. 1 and Blk. 4.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The chaotic behaviors of systems (2) and (3).

(a) The spatiotemporal attractor of the 2D CML (2) with μ = 1.8 and ε = 0.1, (b) the chaotic attractor of the fractional-order Chen system (3) with α1 = α2 = α3 = 0.9.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Experimental results for Lena image.

(a) Original image of Lena, (b) encrypted image of Lena, (c) decrypted image of Lena.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Experimental results for Vegetables image.

(a) Original image of Vegetables, (b) encrypted image of Vegetables, (c) decrypted image of Vegetables.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Histogram of the original image of Lena in the (a) red, (b) green, (c) blue, components.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Histogram of the encrypted image of Lena in the (a) red, (b) green, (c) blue, components.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Vertical direction correlations of two adjacent pixels.

Frames (a), (c) and (e) show the distribution of two vertically adjacent pixels in the plain-image of Lena in the (a) red, (b) green and (c) blue components, respectively. Frames (b), (d) and (f) display the distribution of two vertically adjacent pixels in the encrypted image of Lena in the (b) red, (d) green and (f) blue components, respectively.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 1.

Correlation coefficients of two adjacent pixels in the plain-image and cipher-image.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of correlation coefficients of two adjacent pixels in different directions using the proposed algorithm with some other algorithms.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Comparison of the information entropy using the proposed algorithm with some other algorithms.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 10.

NPCR and UACI performance analysis of the proposed scheme.

(a) NPCR versus permutation rounds, (b) UACI versus permutation rounds.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 4.

NPCR and UACI of the color image of Lena when changing one pixel and permutation rounds n = 10.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Comparison of the average NPCR and UACI values on the color image of Lena.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 11.

Key sensitivity test I.

(a) Original image of Lena, (b) encrypted image of Lena with the secret key K1, (c) encrypted image of Lena with the secret key K2, (d) difference image.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Key sensitivity test II.

(a) Encrypted image of Lena with the secret key K1, (b) decrypted image with the secret key K2, (c) decrypted image with the secret key K1, (d) encrypted image of Lena with the secret key K2, (e) decrypted image with the secret key K1, (f) decrypted image with the secret K2.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Some original plain-images used in Table 6.

(a) City gate tower, (b) Elephantine mountain, (c) Pandas, (d) Peony.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Table 6.

Comparison of pixel difference between images encrypted by keys with one-bit difference.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Comparison of encryption time between our proposed method and some other cryptosystems.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

The PSNR of decrypted image under different image processing operations.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 14.

Test of noise addition.

(a) Original image of Lena, (b) encrypted image of Lena without noise addition, (c) encrypted image of Lena under adding Pepper & Salt noise with noise density 0.005, (d) decrypted image under Pepper & Salt noise addition (noise density 0.005), (e) encrypted image of Lena under adding Pepper & Salt noise with noise density 0.05, (f) decrypted image under Pepper & Salt noise addition (noise density 0.05), (g) encrypted image of Lena under adding Pepper & Salt noise with noise density 0.5, (h) decrypted image under Pepper & Salt noise addition (noise density 0.5), (i) encrypted image of Lena under Gaussian white noise addition, (j) decrypted image under Gaussian white noise addition.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Test of image under cropping.

(a) Cropped cipher-mage by removing 25% of the encrypted image of Lena (Fig. 14(b)), (b) decrypted image of the cropped cipher-image (a), (c) cropped cipher-mage by removing 50% of the encrypted image of Lena (Fig. 14(b)), (d) decrypted image of the cropped cipher-image (c).

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Test of image encryption with JPEG compression.

(a) JPEG compressed cipher-mage of Lena, (b) decrypted image under JPEG compression.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

Test of image under rotation.

(a) Rotated cipher-image of Lena, (b) decrypted image under rotation.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

Test of image under brightening and darkening.

(a) Brightened cipher-image of Lena, (b) decrypted image under brightening, (c) darkened cipher-image of Lena, (d) decrypted image under darkening.

More »

Fig 18 Expand