Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Delayed-start design under conditions of (a) a disease-modifying treatment effect and (b) a symptomatic treatment effect.

Δ1 represents the initial treatment effect at the end of the placebo-controlled period (T1) and Δ2 represents the treatment effect at the end of the delayed-start period (T2). The hypothetical results for a symptomatic treatment (b) assume that the time to peak treatment effect is equal to the duration of the delayed-start period.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Candidate test procedures for noninferiority test.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Underlying mean ADAS-Cog scores for simulations in the disease-modifying treatment effect scenario (Scenario 1) and the symptomatic treatment effect scenario (Scenario 2).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Type I error rates for candidate test procedures and various conditions of missingness mechanism, discontinuation rate, and data inclusion

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Power estimates for candidate test procedures under various conditions of missingness mechanism, discontinuation rate, and data inclusion

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 2.

95% confidence intervals for conditional bias.

25: 25% discontinuation rate; 40: 40% discontinuation rate; All: all data from all randomized patients in both study periods; DS: delayed-start period data only; MAR: missing at random; MCAR: missing completely at random; MNAR: missing not at random; S1: scenario 1, disease-modifying treatment effect scenario; S2: scenario 2, symptomatic treatment effect scenario; T1: time 1, end of placebo-controlled period; T2: time 2, end of delayed-start period. Each line segment represents the 95% confidence interval for the conditional bias estimated across various missingness mechanisms, conditions of underlying drug effect, discontinuation rates, and modeling approaches.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Power curves for underlying treatment scenarios for method 4 (Δ2–0.5 Δ1 > 0) for 25% patient dropout (left) and 40% patient dropout (right).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Delayed start analysis of ADAS-Cog14 scores in patients mild AD from the EXPEDITION, EXPEDITION2, and EXPEDITION-EXT studies of solanezumab.

Abbreviations: ADAS-Cog14 = 14-item Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale—Cognitive subscale; Q4W = every 4 weeks. Note: All p-values shown for values <.05 and endpoint. Error bars represent standard error. Dashed line indicates end of EXPEDITION and EXPEDITION-2 (feeder studies) and beginning of EXPEDITION-EXT.

More »

Fig 4 Expand