Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Dataset characterization.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Intelligence-based networks (IN).

Original gang hierarchy from intelligence analysis in 2007 (left) and hierarchy after intelligence update in 2010 (right). Nodes numbered by gang member number. The arrows illustrate the chain of command in the hierarchy.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Networks with nodes sized by degree centrality.

Upper panel: SN-surveillance network, lower panel: CN-co-offending network. Data from 1995–2010. Color scheme according to updated hierarchy.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Co-offending network (CN) accumulated up to 2007.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Networks with nodes sized by betweenness centrality.

Upper panel: SN-: surveillance network, lower panel: CN: -co-offending network. Data from 1995–2010.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Networks with nodes sized by local clustering coefficient.

Upper panel: SN-: surveillance network, lower panel: CN: -co-offending network. Data from 1995–2010.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of network properties, by network dataset.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Summary of network measures, by network dataset.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Network measures and ranking, by network dataset.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 6.

Merging of SN and CN networks.

Data from 1995–2010.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Normalized rankings across networks, by: (A) degree centrality, (B) betweenness centrality, and (C) local clustering coefficient.

Coloring according to updated assessment: red = level 1, green = level 2, blue = level 3, white = former member (color combinations are shown were more than one hierarchy level is present).

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 5.

Pearson correlation between network measures.

More »

Table 5 Expand