Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Platyrrhine sample with dietary profile.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

) SEM image of the occlusal surface of the right first maxillary (on the left) and first mandibular (on the right) molars of Saimiri sciureus (USNM 546762, Para, Brazil).

a Crests 1–6 are shown. b) Saimiri sciureus (USNM 546762), oblique medial view (above) of right M1–2 and oblique lateral view (below) of P4-M3. The leading edges of eight functional crests are labeled, as are the wear surfaces distal to them. We measured crest lengths 1–6; crests 7 and 8 (associated with the margins of the hypocone and trigonid basin) were not measured. Numbering system of the crests follows Kay [102].

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Laser-scan generated image of Saimiri boliviensis (AMNH 255858) first molars demonstrating calculations for surface relief measures.

See text for calculations. a) and b) oblique lateral view of lower first molar showing cropping at the talonid basin (a) and cemento-enamel junction (b, CEJ); c) upper (top row) and lower (bottom row) first molar in occlusal view with planometric surface area projection depicted to the right.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Box-and-whisker plots showing ranges of individual values for Diet-1 (3 group comparisons).

a) upper molar SQ, b) upper molar RFI, c) lower molar SQ, d) lower molar RFI, e) lower molar OR.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Species means and standard deviations (SD) for dental indexes.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Sample parameters for M1 and M1 occlusal variables grouped by diet.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Results of post-hoc multiple pair-wise comparisons between tooth indices (Wilcoxon each pair) segregated by diet categories.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Summary of correct classification rates for discriminant function analyses using upper molar (M1), lower molar (M1), and upper and lower molar occlusal variables combined.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 4.

Plot of a discriminant function analysis including M1 length, RFI, OR, and phylogenetically corrected SQ and M1 RFI and phylogenetically corrected SQ.

93.6% of variance is accounted for by discriminant function 1 and 6.4% by function 2. Polygons are drawn to include all individual specimens.

More »

Fig 4 Expand