Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The set-up from (A) Study 1, (B) Study 2, and (C) Study 3.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Results of Study 1.

Priority of access in relation to difference in height (cm) (individual who took precedence—individual who gave way) for female and male pairs. The diameter of the open circles indicates sample size. The black dots and bar represent the mean and 95% confidence interval.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Results from Study 2.

The effect of confederate height on the likelihood that a pedestrian gave way (top panels; A, B) or collided with (bottom panels; C, D) a female confederate (left panels; A, C) or male confederate (right panels; B, D).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Results from Study 2.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

Results from Study 3.

The effect of the pedestrian height (standardized) on the likelihood of maintaining one’s path (mean ± SE) and thereby passing close by an opposite-sex or same-sex confederate who was partially blocking the pedestrian’s pathway (see Fig. 1C).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Results from Study 3.

More »

Table 2 Expand