Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Timeline of a single experimental session for encoding and consolidation groups.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Participants’ demographics and recent drug use by group.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Meth effects on recognition.

Effects of METH on mean (+/- SEM) recognition accuracy as a function of self-reported sleep quality in the encoding group. Adequate sleep group consists of participants who reported sleeping at least six hours the night after receiving the 20 mg dose (n = 14); poor sleep group consists of participants who reported sleeping less than six hours the night after receiving the 20 mg dose (n = 15). 1 = perfect discrimination; 0 = no discrimination (chance responding). *p<.05 compared to placebo

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Meth effects on recognition by valence.

Effects of METH on mean (+/- SEM) recognition accuracy for positive, neutral, and negative pictures among adequate sleepers (n = 14; left panel) and poor sleepers (n = 15; right panel) in the encoding group. 1 = perfect discrimination; 0 = no discrimination (chance responding). *p<.05 compared to placebo

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Effects of METH on memory accuracy for each valence category and for all categories combined (Total) among adequate and poor sleepers in the consolidation group.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Effects of METH on subjective and physiological measures in the encoding group (n = 29).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Effects of METH on subjective and physiological measures in the consolidation group (n = 31).

More »

Table 5 Expand