Fig 1.
Cd accumulation in gills of Anodonta woodiana.
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Comparison between the control and treatment groups is notified as * p < 0.05.
Fig 2.
Cd accumulation in mantle of Anodonta woodiana.
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Comparison between the control and treatment groups is notified as * p < 0.05.
Fig 3.
Cd accumulation in foot of Anodonta woodiana.
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Comparison between the control and treatment groups is notified as * p < 0.05.
Fig 4.
Cd accumulation in visceral mass of Anodonta woodiana.
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Comparison between the control and treatment groups is notified as * p < 0.05.
Fig 5.
Cd accumulation in digestive gland of Anodonta woodiana.
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Comparison between the control and treatment groups is notified as * p < 0.05.
Fig 6.
MT content in gills of Anodonta woodiana.
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Comparison between the control and treatment groups is notified as * p < 0.05.
Fig 7.
MT content in mantle of Anodonta woodiana.
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Comparison between the control and treatment groups is notified as * p < 0.05.
Fig 8.
MT content in foot of Anodonta woodiana.
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Comparison between the control and treatment groups is notified as * p < 0.05.
Fig 9.
MT content in visceral mass of Anodonta woodiana.
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Comparison between the control and treatment groups is notified as * p < 0.05.
Fig 10.
MT content in digestive gland of Anodonta woodiana.
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Comparison between the control and treatment groups is notified as * p < 0.05.
Table 1.
Correlations between Cd accumulation and MT levels.