Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Aboveground biomass and N, P and K acquisition of intercropping and weighted means of monocropped crops in 2011 and 2012.

Different capital letters indicate significant differences at P<0.05 by LSD among different P application rates; different lowercase letters with the same P application rates indicate significant differences at P<0.05 by LSD among different cropping systems; F+M, S+M, C+M and T+M indicate intercropping of maize with faba bean, maize and soybean, and chickpea and turnip, respectively; M and I indicate monoculture and intercropping, respectively. The error bars are standard deviation with 3 replicates.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Grain yield (Mg ha−1) as affected by main effects of P application and subplot effects of cropping system in 2011 and 2012.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Soil OM (g kg−1) content as affected by main effects of P application and subplot effects of cropping system in 2011 and 2012.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Soil Olsen P (mg kg−1) as affected by main effects of P application and subplot effects of cropping system in 2011 and 2012.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Soil exchangeable K (mg kg−1) as affected by main effects of P application and subplot effects of cropping system in 2011 and 2012.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Soil CEC (cmol kg−1) as affected by main effects of P application and subplot effects of cropping system in 2011 and 2012.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Urease activity as affected by main effects of P application and subplot effects of cropping system in 2011 and 2012.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Acid phosphatase activity as affected by main effects of P application and subplot effects of cropping system in 2011 and 2012.

More »

Table 7 Expand