Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Group characteristics before training.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Musicianship Class: Learning Objectives.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Summary of instrumental programs and instruments played.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 1.

Music training supports reading abilities and rapid naming.

(A) The children who received music training (n = 23) maintained their age-normed level of reading performance after one year (year 1: 109.5+/−2.1 (mean +/−1 S.E.), year 2: 109.3+/−2.0), while the untrained children's scores declined (n = 19) (year 1: 106.8+/−2.4, year 2: 103.5+/−2.4). (B) The musically-trained group improved on rapid naming (year 1: 103.7+/−2.1, year 2: 107.0+/−2.4), while the untrained controls showed no improvement (year 1: 103.9+/−2.6; year 2: 102.8+/−2.9). The groups did not differ on either measure at the outset of the study.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Improvement in rapid naming relates to reading improvement.

Year-over-year improvement in rapid naming was correlated with the change in composite reading score across all participants (r = .412, p = .007, n = 42).

More »

Figure 2 Expand