Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Location, geomorphology, and land cover in 2000 of Puerto Rico (Land cover information from Kennaway and Helmer, 2007).

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

The fragmentation indices used in the landscape analysis.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Island-wide fragmentation analyses for urban, forest, and wetland areas in 1991 and 2000.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 2.

Spatial distributions of reforestation sites, deforestation sites, and unchanged forests (F_F) during the period of 1991–2000.

The forest distribution in the deforestation-only scenario includes the F_F only, while that in the reforestation-only scenario includes all the three types. The true distribution in 1991 includes deforestation sites and unchanged forests; the true distribution in 2000 includes unchanged forests and reforestation sites.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Fragmentation dynamics of (a) urban edge density (ED, m ha−1), (b) forest mean patch area (AREA_MN, ha), and (c) wetland edge-to-area ratio (EDGE_AREA, m m−2) in 1977, 1991, and 2000.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 3.

Assessment of average increments of the fragmentation indices from 1991 to 2000 by fitting the intercept of the spatial error model.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Predicted changes in urban and forest fragmentation index with the distance to urban centers in 1977, 1991, and 2000.

(a) the edge-to-area ratio of urban areas; (b) the edge density of urban areas; (c) the edge density of forests; and (d) the mean patch area of forests.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table 4.

Spatial error models of land fragmentation indices regressed on biophysical and socioeconomic drivers.

More »

Table 4 Expand