Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Extensive successful previous work on negation detection in clinical text.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Characteristics of four corpora with negation annotations.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

In the MiPACQ and SHARP corpora, the named entities (NEs) are annotated with different semantic groups which occur with different frequencies (left columns).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 1.

The cTAKES Pipeline.

The SHARPn Polarity Module is an Attribute Discovery algorithm. Training and evaluations use gold standard NEs (skip NER).

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Significance bands of model performance for each test corpus.

These are labeled with successive letters from right to left in Table 4.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 4.

Performance (F1 score) in practical negation detection situations.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Figure 3.

Learning curve for i2b2 training data on various corpora.

For each proportion of the i2b2 corpus (x axis), the reported F-score (y axis) is an average of 5 randomly sampled runs.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 5.

Average F-score with and without frustratingly easy domain adaptation (FEDA).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Figure 4.

The effect of named entity length (in number of words) on performance for each of 6 training configurations.

SHARP, MiPACQ, and i2b2 test sets are used for evaluation.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

The effect of named entity semantic group on the F-score of 6 models.

SHARP, MiPACQ, and i2b2 test sets are used for evaluation.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Table 6.

Top negation context features in a multi-corpus model, by chi-square value; and feature rank in domain-specific models.

More »

Table 6 Expand