Figure 1.
TRI values and location of case study areas (world map: [103]).
Figure 2.
Absolute difference in coverage (%) between fine and coarse resolution LULC classification.
+ and – indicate over- and underestimation at the coarse resolution.
Figure 3.
Absolute difference between coarse and fine resolution ES values (%) for all ES and case study areas.
Figure 4.
Moran’s I for all case study areas and ES at fine and coarse resolution plotted against lag distance classes of 500 m.
Indicated on the x-Axis is the upper distance of each lag.
Figure 5.
Box- and Whisker plots of land use classes (x-Axis) and ES values (y-Axis) for fine resolution timber production.
Figure 6.
Box- and Whisker plots of land use classes (x-Axis) and ES values (y-Axis) for coarse resolution scenic beauty across all sites.