Figure 1.
From left to right: the Tropical Andes, the African Great Lakes, and the Greater Mekong.
Figure 2.
Monitoring status of the indicators, as reported by national experts via questionnaire responses.
The mean score and its standard error for each indicator are shown by region. Number of respondent is 36 for Tropical Andes, 46 for African Great Lakes, and 50 for Greater Mekong.
Figure 3.
Perceived benefits of using global data within a dashboard approach, by sector.
Number of respondent is 51 for public sector, 60 for civil-society, and 21 for academic sector.
Figure 4.
Perceived challenges to biodiversity monitoring by region.
Number of respondent is 36 for Tropical Andes, 46 for African Great Lakes, and 50 for Greater Mekong.
Table 1.
Biodiversity indicators summary and data sources.
Table 2.
Number of species recorded and analyzed to derive Red List Index (only extant species that are not Data Deficient were included).
Figure 5.
Dashboard indicator baseline results.
Results for (A) Forest Cover (2000); (B) Red List Index a measure of change in extinction risk (2008); (C) Protected Area Coverage of Key Biodiversity Areas (2010); and (D) Freshwater Provision (2010).
Figure 6.
Dashboard indicator trend results.
Annual rate of (A) Gross Forest Cover Loss (2000–2005); (B) Change in Red List Index as a measure of extinction risk (change for all species of mammals, birds, and amphibians; 1980–2008); and (C) Change of Protected Area Coverage of Key Biodiversity Areas (1980–2010).
Figure 7.
Dashboard indicator trend graphs by region.
A.1 – A.3 chart gross forest loss as a percent of forest cover in 2000; B.1-B.3 chart change in Red List Index for mammals (green), birds (red), and amphibians (blue); and C.1-C3 chart change in protected area coverage of key biodiversity areas (1950–2010) with solid lines indicating the mean percent protected across all sites, and dashed line indicating the 95% confidence intervals [60].
Table 3.
Baseline and trend results for all indicators by country and region.