Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Methods.

a) Experimental procedure b) Schematic of chemotaxis assay plate. The locations A and B represent chemoattractant and control spots, respectively. The circles indicate a region with a diameter of 3 cm around the compounds that was used to determine the chemotaxis index. The location C represents the spot at which C. elegans were initially placed and c) Schematic of the harmonic-curvature model that shows skeleton data for worm superimposed with the fit.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Various shapes of crawling C. elegans.

The corresponding model representations are shown as white lines along the backbone of worms. The experimental images were obtained at 20°C on 2 wt% agar. The ratio for all the shapes are also shown.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Classification of worm shapes.

a) Probability of shapes of C. elegans classified into ‘regular’ (open) and ‘complex’ (filled) based on the average ratio . The corresponding temperature is shown above the bars and b) average ratio of parameters for pre-exposed worms as a function of recovery time. The average ratio for control animals is shown as a dashed line.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Root mean squared distance traveled by the worms as a function of time.

The pre-exposed worms traveled larger distances in the 15 minute window of observation.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table 1.

Average velocity, calculated from the slope of RMSD curves (Fig. 4) and the net displacement of worms from their respective starting points for control and pre-exposed animals.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 5.

Probability of worm motion.

a) travelling forward and b) turning for both pre-exposed (squares) and control (triangles) worms. The dashed-lines are just guides to the eye.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

Probability of reversals for pre-exposed and control worms.

No significant effect of temperature pre-exposure was found on reversals.

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Figure 7.

Chemotaxis Indices () of pre-exposed worms as a function of recovery time for three different chemoattractants.

The average chemotaxis indices of control animals are NaOAc = 0.329, NaCl = 0.352, and NH4Cl = 0.356.

More »

Figure 7 Expand

Figure 8.

Chemotaxis velocity.

a) Average distance between C. elegans and chemoattractant concentration peak as a function of time during the chemotaxis experiment for control worms (solid) and pre-exposed animals after 0 (dash-dot), 10 (dashed), 20 (dotted), and 30 (dash-dot-dot) minutes and b) speed with which C. elegans approach the concentration peak obtained from slopes of curves in a).

More »

Figure 8 Expand

Figure 9.

Fraction of worms traveling towards the concentration peak during chemotaxis as a function of recovery time.

The dashed-line is for control worms.

More »

Figure 9 Expand