Figure 1.
Flowchart for our cohort study.
SES: Socioeconomic status.
Table 1.
Participant characteristics by whether participants had been absent due to mental disease across a 2-year follow-up.
Figure 2.
ROC curve and AUC for absolute and relative presenteeism.
Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of absolute and relative presenteeism as indicators of mental-disease-related absence; AUC: the area under the curve; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.
Figure 3.
ROC curve of 3 cutoff values for absolute and relative presenteeism.
Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of absolute and relative presenteeism as indicators of mental-disease-related absence; AUC: the area under the curve; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; A ROC analysis of absolute presenteeism revealed cutoff points of 40, 50, and 60. A ROC analysis of relative presenteeism revealed cutoff points of 0.8, 0.9, and 1.0.
Table 2.
Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of cutoff value of absolute and relative presenteeism in the prediction of absence due to mental disease.
Figure 4.
Histograms of absolute and relative presenteeism in our cohort.
Table 3.
Odds ratios and 95% CIs for absence due to mental disease or non-mental disease according to proposed cutoff scores for absolute presenteeism (≤40) in actual prospective cohort data.
Table 4.
Odds ratios and 95% CIs for absence due to mental disease or non-mental disease according to proposed cutoff score for relative presenteeism (≤0.8) in actual prospective cohort data.
Table 5.
Odds ratios and 95% CIs for depressive symptoms (K6≥13) after one year according to proposed absolute presenteeism or relative presenteeism cutoff scores.