Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Histogram of the distribution of the Tac C/D ratio (ng/mL*1/mg).

The patients showed a symmetric distribution relating to their C/D ratio and were categorized in three groups: slow, intermediate and fast metabolizers. Intermediate metabolizers were grouped around the mean C/D ratio value (1.05–1.54). Patients showing a C/D ratio <1.05 were defined as fast metabolizers, ≥1.55 as slow metabolizers.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Patients characteristics.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Medication doses and blood trough concentrations.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 2.

eGFR value comparison between the three metabolism groups (a).

Fast and intermediate Tac metabolizers showed statistically noticeable lower eGFR values compared to slow metabolizers one month after RTx. P-values refer to the linear mixed model. Renal function in a 24 months follow-up (b). The differences between the follow-up eGFR values (month 2, 3, 6, 12, 24) and the eGFR value and the eGFR value at month 1 are shown for every metabolism group.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 3.

Renal function (linear mixed model).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Antibodies, HLA MM, DGF, infections and biopsy results.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Reasons for switching immunosuppression and adverse events.

More »

Table 5 Expand