Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Characteristics of the participants (n = 306).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Results of Mokken scale analysis on the items of the BI-SS (n = 306).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 1.

Correlation (A) and Bland-Altman plot (B) for the BI and Self-perceived Difficulty Scale.

Bland-Altman method for plotting the scores of the difference between the BI and Self-perceived Difficulty Scale. The 2 dashed lines define the limits of agreement (mean of difference ±1.96 SD).

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Correlation (A) and Bland-Altman plot (B) for the BI and Ability Scale.

The Ability Scale scores were 0•20 transformed scores.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Correlation (A) and Bland-Altman plot (B) for the Self-perceived Difficulty Scale and Ability Scale.

The Ability Scale scores were 0•20 transformed scores.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 3.

The results of the agreement between the paired scales and the numbers of participants whose difference between 2 scales was beyond 1.85 points.

More »

Table 3 Expand