Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Flowchart of study selection.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Results of 2007 tests of associations from 1053 NHS publications.

aResults were statistically non-significant but the abstract implied an association exists. bAn association was reported in the abstract with insufficient information to determine the strength or direction of the association.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Strength of 1002 statistically significant relative risks and odds ratios reported in NHS publications.

Associations with an odds ratio (OR) or relative risk (RR) of ≤0.25 or ≥4 were considered strong, those with OR/RR of 0.25–0.5 or 2–4 were considered moderate, and those with OR/RR of 0.5–2 were considered weak.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 1.

Results of 2007 associations reported in 1053 Nurses’ Health Study Abstracts.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Top 20 most frequently published Journals for Nurses’ Health Study publications.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Results of Nurses’ Health Study and related randomised clinical trials for breast cancer.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Results of Nurses’ Health Study and related randomised clinical trials for ischaemic heart disease.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Results of Nurses’ Health Study and related randomised clinical trials for osteoporosis.

More »

Table 5 Expand