Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Model Comparison: “Components” Model (Griffiths, 2005) vs. Internet Gaming Disorder DSM-5 nine criteria (APA, 2013).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Socio-Demographic Characteristics of the Sample.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the 20 items of the IGD-20 Test.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Summary of the Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results on the IGD-20 Test Items.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Overall correlation between the six IGD-20 Test factors and its corresponding IGD nine criteria.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Results Obtained from the Latent Profile Analysis.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Figure 1.

The Five Classes Obtained from the Latent Profile Analysis.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 7.

Comparison of the five latent classes: Testing Equality for Latent Class Predictors.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Comparison of the five latent classes: Testing Equality for Latent Class Predictors.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Cut-Off Points for the IGD-20 Test based on the Fifth class (high addiction risk group) derived from the Latent Profile Analysis.

More »

Table 9 Expand