Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Recruitment flow chart.

This Figure presents the screening and enrolment flow diagram, including reasons for screening failure. A total of 595 women were screened and 430 were enrolled in the study: 219 in the reference group; 60 pregnant women; 60 adolescents; 31 women engaging in vaginal practices; 30 FSW; and 30 HIV-positive women. ICRHK: International Centre of Reproductive Health, Mombasa, Kenya; RU: Rinda Ubuzima, Kigali, Rwanda; WrHI: Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa. Other ineligibility reasons: moving out of the area; not able to keep appointments due to mobility; unknown. Vaginal practices: Using traditional vaginal practices with anything other than water, soap and/or fingers alone.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Sociodemographic, behavioural, and clinical characteristics of the study population by group.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 2.

The prevalence of Bacterial Vaginosis at screening and at enrolment.

The prevalence of BV at enrolment was highest in female sex workers (68%) and HIV-positive women (48%) in Rwanda. Black bar: Nugent score 7–10 classified as BV; Grey bar: Nugent score 4–6 classified as intermediate; White bar: Nugent score 0–3 classified as normal. Groups: R = Reference group, P = Pregnant women, A = adolescents, V = vaginal practices, FSW = female sex worker, and HIV+ = HIV-positive women.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 2.

Correlates of bacterial vaginosis at the screening and enrolment visit - bivariable and multivariable models.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Correlates of reproductive tract infections at the screening visit - bivariable and multivariable models.

More »

Table 3 Expand