Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Flow diagram of study selection.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Quality assessment of the 9 studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis as determined using the Delphi List.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Characteristics of studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 2.

Forest plot showing results for the meta-analysis of difference in mean change from baseline in lean-body-mass after intervention: treatment vs. control.

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 3.

Summary of 9 trials included in the systematic review and meta-analysis.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 3.

Forest plot showing results for the meta-analysis of difference in mean change from baseline in (A) muscle strength of double leg press and (B) muscle strength of leg extension after intervention: treatment vs. control.

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Results of sensitivity analysis to examine the influence of individual studies on pooled estimates as determined using the leave-one-out approach: (A) lean-body-mass; (B) muscle strength of double leg press.

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Funnel plot for the assessment of publication bias for studies included in the meta-analysis of the assessment of the mean change from baseline in lean body mass after intervention.

More »

Figure 5 Expand