Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Flow diagram of identification of relevant studies in the present meta-analysis.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Patient demographic and clinical characteristics.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Funnel plot for main operative outcomes (complications, conversions, and transfusions) among all studies that compared robotic surgery and laparoscopy.

(A) Publication bias regarding complications (Begg's test: Z = 0.48, p = 0.63; Egger's test: t = 1.03, p = 0.032). (B) Publication bias regarding conversions (Begg's test: Z = 1.22, p = 0.022; Egger's test: t = −1.64, p = 0.20). (C) Publication bias regarding transfusions (Begg's test: Z = 0.62, p = 0.54; Egger's test: t = 1.55, p = 0.17).

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Comparison of robotic surgery and laparoscopy with respect to (A) operating time, (B) complications, (C) length of hospital stay, (D) estimated blood loss, (E) transfusions, (F) total number of lymph nodes harvested, and (G) conversions.

OR: odds ratio; WMD: weighted mean difference.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Comparison of robotic surgery and laparotomy with respect to (A) operating time, (B) complications, (C) length of hospital stay, (D) estimated blood loss, (E) transfusions, and (F) total number of lymph nodes harvested.

OR: odds ratio; WMD: weighted mean difference.

More »

Figure 4 Expand