Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Location and characteristics of study species and sites.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Climatic and edaphic characteristics of study sites.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Frequencies and assignments of the main peaks identified in the analysis of FTIR spectra.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 1.

FTIR spectra of gypsovag species.

The scale of the Y axis is offset for illustration purposes. a) Linum suffruticosum (blue), b) Rosmarinus officinalis (purple), c) Salvia lavandulifolia (green), d) Teucrium polium subsp. capitatum (red), e) Thymelaea tinctoria (pink). Abbreviations of compound peaks: Am: Amide, L: Lignin/Phenolic backbone, Ps: Polysaccharides.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

FTIR spectra of narrow gypsum endemisms.

The scale of the Y axis is offset for illustration purposes. a) Centarurea hyssopifolia (blue), b) Helianthemum marifolium subsp. conquense (red), c) Teucrium pumilum (purple), d) Thymus lacaitae (green). Abbreviations of compound peaks: CH: CH-stretching, Es: Esters.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

FTIR spectra of wide gypsophiles.

The scale of the Y axis is offset for illustration purposes. a) Helianthemum squamatum (purple), b) Lepidium subulatum (red), c) Herniaria fructicosa (green), d) Gypsophyla struthium subsp. hispanica (blue), e) Ononis tridentata (pink). Abbreviations of compound peaks: Gy: Gypsum, Ox: Oxalate.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 4.

Results of PLS regression analyses between FTIR spectra and the C (%), N (mg/g), C/N, Na (mg/g), K (mg/g), Ca (%), Mg (mg/g), P (mg/g), S (%) and Ash (%) concentrations of the samples analysed.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Confusion matrix of plant types, based on neural network model prediction.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Figure 4.

Input datasets averaged over each of the gypsum plant types (gypsovags in blue, narrow gypsum endemisms in red, wide gypsophiles in green), for the full wavenumber range.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Input datasets averaged over each of the plant types (gypsovags in blue, narrow gypsum endemisms in red, wide gypsophiles in green), for the input wavenumber range 1500 to 1900 cm−1.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

Input datasets averaged over each of the plant types (gypsovags in blue, narrow gypsum endemisms in red, wide gypsophiles in green), for the input wavenumber range 1200 to 1400 cm−1.

More »

Figure 6 Expand