Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Means, standard deviations, intra-class correlations and correlations for trait neuroticism, state neuroticism, task performance, and task complexity (Study 1).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Means, standard deviations, intra-class correlations and correlations for trait neuroticism, state neuroticism, task performance, and work pressure (Study 2).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Means, standard deviations, intra-class correlations and correlations for trait neuroticism, state neuroticism, task performance, work pressure and task complexity (Study 3).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Parameter estimates and variance components of the HLM models tested (Study 1).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Figure 1.

The moderating effect of low (−2 SD) and high (+2 SD) levels of momentary task complexity on the state neuroticism – task performance relationship (Study 1).

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 5.

Parameter estimates and variance components of the HLM models tested (Study 2).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Figure 2.

The moderating effect of low (−2 SD) and high (+2 SD) levels of momentary work pressure on the state neuroticism – task performance relationship (Study 2).

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 6.

Parameter estimates and variance components of the HLM models tested (Study 3)

More »

Table 6 Expand

Figure 3.

The moderating effect of low (−2 SD) and high (+2 SD) levels of momentary work pressure on the state neuroticism – task performance relationship (Study 3).

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

The moderating effect of low (−2 SD) and high (+2 SD) levels of momentary task complexity on the state neuroticism – task performance relationship (Study 3).

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table 7.

Post-hoc power calculations for all three studies, using the MLPowSim-software.

More »

Table 7 Expand