Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics and clinical details of participants.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

The experimental paradigm.

Patients walked across the virtual plank in two virtual environments: A) LOW: while the plank was located on the ground; B) HIGH: participants viewed the floor descend, and then were instructed to walk across the plank above the deep pit.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 2.

Freezing of gait measures during walking in virtual reality.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 2.

Comparison of anxiety ratings after participants walked across the plank.

Error bars represent standard error of the mean. * illustrates significant differences between groups (p<0.05).

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Comparison of on-state freezing of gait between HIGH and LOW conditions.

Error bars represent standard error of the mean. * illustrates a significant difference between conditions within Freezers (p<0.05).

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 3.

Comparison of overall spatiotemporal aspects of gait between Freezers and Non-freezers.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Comparison of step-to-step variability between Freezers and Non-Freezers.

Error bars represent standard error of the mean. * illustrates a significant difference within Freezers between the HIGH and LOW condition (p<0.05).

More »

Figure 4 Expand